
| · Forums and IRC Rules · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Today's Top 10 Posters · My Last 10 Posts | Board and IRC Rules · Help · Members · Calendar |
| Forum | Topics | Replies | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Older topics Here you can access all topics posted from May 12th 2005 to Apr 9th 2006 (In read only mode). |
1126 | 15694 | 9 Apr, 2006, 11:06 In: [GAME]Learn how to count to...By: DJ Omnimaga |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| brandonw |
Posted: 23 Oct, 2007, 23:34
|
||
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 7 Member No.: 208 Joined: 11 Oct, 2006 |
More like TI was too lazy to remove the "if 83+BE, do this, otherwise do that" checks from the 84+/SE OS, and the 83+SE has no use (at the moment) for the extra RAM pages (in TI's view). It's there for future expansion, nothing else. USB later ended up being the expansion. They can't change how the VAT's page byte works because that would break everyone's 83+ code, and they strive for compatibility between all four calculators. |
||
| Jon |
Posted: 23 Oct, 2007, 23:36
|
||
![]() Extreme Poster Group: Coders Of Tomorrow Posts: 265 Member No.: 296 Joined: 14 Jan, 2007 |
-------------------- I eat assembly code for breakfast My Projects: Not getting dumped: 100% EvilFate: 5% MPack: 65% DK: 5% Tetris: 100% (download it or die) ASM Tutorials: 15% Z80 - You see this name, you think dirty. ![]() ![]() My Ticalc Profile!
|
||
| DJ Omnimaga |
Posted: 23 Oct, 2007, 23:42
|
![]() Ragol666 Group: Founder Posts: 11283 Member No.: 1 Joined: 9 Apr, 2006 |
haha yeah this is kinda contradictory to the usual
but he has a good point thobtw is there anyone who ever managed to get a TI-73 OS to run on a 83+ or vice versa? Or a 84+ OS on a 83+SE or vice versa for that matter? -------------------- |
| Jon |
Posted: 23 Oct, 2007, 23:44
|
||
![]() Extreme Poster Group: Coders Of Tomorrow Posts: 265 Member No.: 296 Joined: 14 Jan, 2007 |
yaya. but to answer your question, no, DEL ALL does not clear those pages.
i should warn that the reason RAM clears so often is that it requires a constant power supply, so you CAN reset those pages if you take out all the batteries (including the little coin thingy) This post has been edited by Jon on 23 Oct, 2007, 23:47 -------------------- I eat assembly code for breakfast My Projects: Not getting dumped: 100% EvilFate: 5% MPack: 65% DK: 5% Tetris: 100% (download it or die) ASM Tutorials: 15% Z80 - You see this name, you think dirty. ![]() ![]() My Ticalc Profile!
|
||
| brandonw |
Posted: 24 Oct, 2007, 0:01
|
||
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 7 Member No.: 208 Joined: 11 Oct, 2006 |
You can put the 73 OS on an 83+ and the 83+ OS on a 73. Lots of people have put the 73 OS on an 83+ before...as far as the latter... here. Off the top of my head, I don't see why the 84+/SE OS can't run on an 83+SE, but I don't have one so I can't test. |
||
| Jon |
Posted: 24 Oct, 2007, 0:46
|
||
![]() Extreme Poster Group: Coders Of Tomorrow Posts: 265 Member No.: 296 Joined: 14 Jan, 2007 |
but anyways, i'd have a VAT for your extra RAM pages, and i'd start it at $FFFF of page 7, and allow it to shift VARS within all 6 pages (2-7, cuz 0 and 1 are not hidden pages)
Actually, maybe start it at 07:FFFD, with a word at 07:FFFE that tells where the VAT ends (kinda like (ptemp) for the regular vat) This post has been edited by Jon on 24 Oct, 2007, 19:56 -------------------- I eat assembly code for breakfast My Projects: Not getting dumped: 100% EvilFate: 5% MPack: 65% DK: 5% Tetris: 100% (download it or die) ASM Tutorials: 15% Z80 - You see this name, you think dirty. ![]() ![]() My Ticalc Profile!
|
||
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |