Printable Version of Topic
Click here to view this topic in its original format
Pilots For Truth > Lobby > Fox-5 Foreknowledge Of Wtc-7 Collapse?


Posted by: Timothy Osman Feb 8 2008, 06:39 AM
Check this out.

QUOTE
The video footage speaks for itself. Fox-5 anchor Tracey Neale says that a 47-story building had collapsed in downtown Manhattan which is an obvious reference to WTC-7 because it too was a 47-story building in downtown Manhattan. Then just seconds after Neale reports on the building collapse, they witness WTC-7 collapse at free fall speed in their own video footage.




http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=6533

Posted by: rob balsamo Feb 8 2008, 09:05 AM
[dohtml]

laughing1.gif


freakin dopes...

Posted by: Omega892R09 Feb 8 2008, 10:46 AM
QUOTE (rob balsamo @ Feb 8 2008, 09:05 AM)


freakin dopes...

Aha! Jane Stanley (BBC) you are not alone in being informed beforehand. Those who claim that Stanley's background frame shows only a video output screen (when clearly it is just a part of the background) should consider this too.

How did he know right away that it was due to structural failure ('...because the fires were too intense...' laugh.gif ) - probably had word from that accomplice wearing the Harley logo BB cap and sweat shirt seen on the street in other clips.

Copies of their scripts should be around somewhere.

Posted by: painter Feb 8 2008, 11:27 AM
I hate watching these talking head idiots. I don't watch TV any more except when I see clips like this on youtube or in a video -- and it always strikes me the same way now: PROPAGANDA. THEY are telling ME how "it" IS. Whatever is going on THEY are FRAMING OUR perception. There he is saying it looks just like a Hollywood production. Not that it IS a Hollywood production -- which would be closer to the truth.

What was going on in these presenters minds? Was this "live" feed from the scene (looks to be the same shot angle more or less of the BBC broadcast -- we could probably identify the building). If it was live feed, what were guys in the control room thinking? First the report and then we see it happening "live"? Or did they believe they were watching previously recorded footage?

As the guy in Zeitgeist says, It must be difficult for those who have taken authority as truth rather than truth as the authority.

Posted by: shoon Feb 8 2008, 03:23 PM
It is interesting that at that moment US government thought it would be great to broadcast WTC7 collapse but later at certain point they realized that it would cause conflicts. They did not ever mentioned on the OFFICIAL final report. I wonder when they realized it. dunno.gif

Posted by: amazed! Feb 8 2008, 04:59 PM
As I recall it was on Richard Gage's DVD that I learned, and saw videos of, the cops on the street shooing pedestrians away from the area, telling them the building was coming down soon.

If the cop on the street knew it was coming down, I would say prior knowledge was pretty widespread. ninja.gif

Posted by: painter Feb 8 2008, 05:37 PM
QUOTE (amazed! @ Feb 8 2008, 01:59 PM)
As I recall it was on Richard Gage's DVD that I learned, and saw videos of, the cops on the street shooing pedestrians away from the area, telling them the building was coming down soon.

If the cop on the street knew it was coming down, I would say prior knowledge was pretty widespread. ninja.gif

And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

Posted by: Omega892R09 Feb 9 2008, 06:12 AM
QUOTE (painter @ Feb 8 2008, 05:37 PM)
And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

Aye, but we all know Ďpullí refers to getting the fire fighter teams out. Donít we? whistle.gif

Posted by: amazed! Feb 9 2008, 10:06 AM
I still hold the opinion that the reason 7 had to come down was that the EOC on the 27th floor, or wherever it was, contained huge amounts of incriminating evidence.

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)