Fictional but funny.


http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/crossexamDAWKINS.htm Chortle

its hilarious :D

i think in real life it would go a different way, i think it would end up with zammit spitting his dummy out and calling him names, because things dont go the way he wanted it to be and dawkins doesnt give up as easily as he expected.

i think dawkins is more intelligent than zammit.

Zammit would slaughter dawkins with his accumulated evidence and that is what it's all about,not about dogmatic assumptions..There no direct evidence against the afterlife only a mountain of evidence for it.Dawkins refuses to debate with him and he has offered one million dollars for anyone to show why the evidence is wrong.

And we all know mountains of horse manure regularly turn into solid gold. :rolleyes:

i actually dont think zammit would win, mainly because he doesnt have the personality for constructive debate, he will just end up calling names.

he sees so much evidence as he doesnt look for natural explanations as he only things crazy people do that.

i dont think id debate with zammit either, it would be frustrating.

Like herding cats :lol:

ive talked to zammit before, although not a proper debate, but ive debated with people like him before and it was frustrating.

from the way he talks about the sceptics and how he thinks they think and act, and the certanty (is that even a word???) in which he claims he is right, i would probably be either facepalming or wanting to strangle him in the first 10 minutes, and i am generally a peaceful person.

generally the more someone believes they are right, the further they usually are from the truth, as theyre less willing to learn new things by taking on board other peoples points of view, as they already think they know all the answers.

Spot on Kayls. And, as I always say ... it works both ways. But there, that's people for you. :D

yes, of course it does. closed mindedness and arrogance comes in all flavours.