View Full Version: What's Better?

Ancient Legion > Question and Polls > What's Better?


Title: What's Better?
Description: Pure Strength, or Strategy


Necroswordia - July 11, 2008 04:08 PM (GMT)
Vote for which one you think is better!!!!!

I vote strategy, but STR is good too :lol:

U R Dead Nao - July 11, 2008 06:27 PM (GMT)
its all in the strats ;]

Necroswordia - July 11, 2008 08:23 PM (GMT)
Yup, That's what everybody voted for for now....

magik man262 - July 11, 2008 09:51 PM (GMT)
well stregnth is better , as if you were all 100+ against a team of 80+ then str would prevail

as if u were high lvl , youwould have knowledege of strategies

thechicken95 - July 12, 2008 11:37 AM (GMT)
i think strength is more important-ive been in plenty of well strategised clans with 50+ ppl what got owned by 10 or so 100+'s. they just walk around and are invincible!

Zandira - July 15, 2008 04:13 AM (GMT)
Strategy, without a doubt. If an entire clan piles, spams, etc. efficientely, they're very tough to beat. Also, having mages and rangers ready ahead of time is mad useful in clan wars. Snipe!

FiveBrain - July 15, 2008 01:20 PM (GMT)
Stratagy is more important. Strength is also important, but if you had no orginization it doesn't matter if you can hit high if you cant pile or spam effectivly.

madriftz - July 15, 2008 10:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (FiveBrain @ Jul 15 2008, 08:20 AM)
Stratagy is more important. Strength is also important, but if you had no orginization it doesn't matter if you can hit high if you cant pile or spam effectivly.

yea but if its lvl 80 cb str pure vs normal lvl 80 cb then str pure would win for sure.... 99 str by lvl 79 with 60 att 99 str at 67 cb with 40 att lol

Necroswordia - July 27, 2008 02:30 PM (GMT)
so basically, if you use both perfect.

TMWwayne - August 1, 2008 08:01 PM (GMT)
have 10 126s vs a clan of like 40 who use strategy doesnt matter if none of the 40 are any decent of a fight theyll get slaughtered i did that the other day 5 vs 40 we won and didnt lose a single person because the other clan sucked they had mages but they all died pretty much instantly

Necroswordia - August 1, 2008 08:31 PM (GMT)
Yeah well, mages do lots of damage in wars (If they're good.) but they have bad defence. and I mean bad. Like, 5 hits hes dead. :P

hellbound487 - August 1, 2008 09:32 PM (GMT)
Its Strategy like for instance look at our battle with rune expel they had lots of higher lvls but in the end a bunch of lvl 70-90's can own them no matter how strong they are (prank ftw). so its good to have a 70+ plus clan that knows what there doing instead of a lvl 90 + clan with no clue.

TMWwayne - August 1, 2008 11:25 PM (GMT)
once again if the 90s see mages typically theyre smart enough to kick thier butts outa there and kill them instantly and the rest are pie..

Conor0999 - August 2, 2008 02:45 PM (GMT)
50 pures with 70+ str vs 10 ppl with 50+ str and 50+ def 43+ prayer

I'd pick the 10 ppl anyday.

Necroswordia - August 2, 2008 03:02 PM (GMT)
About Mages, The ONLY people who should be maging arpeople with HIGH DEFENCE (Like Magik) and HIGH MAGE because magic defence is based using a 70% DEF Bonus and 30% Mage Bonus.

So if you want to mage you gotta get high def and mage! :lol:

Just thought I'd Bring that up cuz lvl 90 mages with 50 def get owned while maging! :P

jpie20 - August 2, 2008 03:26 PM (GMT)
I think its better to have a good strategy and be organized then being really high level but not sure what he's doing

ancients own man - August 3, 2008 10:59 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Necroswordia @ Aug 2 2008, 10:02 AM)
About Mages, The ONLY people who should be maging arpeople with HIGH DEFENCE (Like Magik) and HIGH MAGE because magic defence is based using a 70% DEF Bonus and 30% Mage Bonus.

So if you want to mage you gotta get high def and mage! :lol:

Just thought I'd Bring that up cuz lvl 90 mages with 50 def get owned while maging! :P

i can mage too... with 50 def im able to survive longer then most of u... like in one of those wars, i was maging and meleeing yet i was last to die.

Anyways..... it depends on the situation, 10 organized lvl 80s can beat 6 lvl 90-100s with organization, but at the same time, 5000 lvl 3s cant beat a lvl 126 can they? so a clan with cb about 90 average can beat just about any1 with good organization/ spam/ pile ect. But if your a lvl 70 average clan like us, its all levels, we cant beat no 90 average clan even if they are unorganized.

hey and those pures ****ed us up.... i mean i think it was 8 on 11 or something, but they all had 20 and under defence, yet the raped us.... how is that? they had only 2 people i beleive that was over lvl 90... the rest was 70 something or lower, and we had all 80+ and we got raped... we only managed to kill 1 pure... how is that? kinda sad if u ask me.

loot rune g - August 11, 2008 07:22 PM (GMT)
in all the wars ive been in i the deciding factor usually seems to be strength to me anyway for example when i was a pure like over half a year ago i was in a war with my clan 5 on 5 and we owned them then we got crashed by 2 mains a 90 and 86 and we got owned until a 75 from other clan that was watching came and helped we had 5 they had 2 soon became 1 cuz 1 guy was terrible (crashers)

just go on youtube and search

legion of pures

its 1st 1 i think

Kbt9126 - August 13, 2008 08:33 PM (GMT)
Strategy Is Pwnage so is Pure str but i vote strategy




Hosted for free by zIFBoards